Comments by Taylor Dunaway

Utah’s natural landscape is one of our state’s greatest strengths.

Mon, 09 Mar 2026 13:49:56 -0400

This appeals to pathos because it brings emotion and opinion into my reasoning to appeal to the reader

The current license requirement not only helps regulate use of these areas, but also provides critical funding for conservation, habitat restoration, and long-term wildlife management.

Mon, 09 Mar 2026 13:48:12 -0400

This part uses logical reasoning and has evidence to show my opinion

My name is Taylor Dunaway, and I am a senior at Judge Memorial Catholic High School in your district.

Mon, 09 Mar 2026 13:46:27 -0400

This appeals to ethos because it shows credibility and identifies who I am

This is an example of logical fallacy because it places blame on snowball with no real reasoning. This also is seen in social media when many people assume a person has done a particular action with ho real evidence to back up their claim.

Wed, 25 Feb 2026 13:37:47 -0500

This letter would work because it clearly address the problem from the start and shows how passing the bill could create issues for utahs wildlife. It adderess my senators stance and address why it should stay that way

Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:27:11 -0500

Wait this bill is more sayong we should get rid of liscences, so would u ay that plubm would be against it?

Fri, 20 Feb 2026 13:38:02 -0500

Nice catch—that changes the logic a lot.

If HB0018 is getting rid of hunting/fishing licenses, that would likely reduce money that usually goes to wildlife management, conservation, and safety programs.
Senator Plumb’s record shows she tends to support regulations that protect public health, safety, and the environment, even when they add some requirements for people ((Utah State Senate, Jen Plumb, n.d.)).
Because of that, it’s reasonable to predict she would probably be skeptical of, or opposed to, a bill that removes licenses if it weakens conservation funding or responsible use of public lands.
For your letter or assignment, it’s safest to say you are *inferring* she might be against HB0018 based on her values (public health, safety, environment), not that you know her stance for sure, unless you find an actual vote or quote.

How would you explain, in 2–3 simple sentences, *why* you think she’d likely oppose getting rid of licenses—then either click *Continue with AI* so we can shape that reasoning together, OR go to Create Document to start or upload your draft?

The bill is called the public land access admendments, its the one about people having to have a liscnese to go fishing or hunting, now what do u think her stance wouod be

Fri, 20 Feb 2026 13:38:02 -0500

Here’s how you might think it through, based on what’s known about her, not as a hard fact:

Jen Plumb is a Democratic state senator and an ER doctor who usually supports public‑safety rules when they are data‑driven and don’t unfairly target poor or marginalized people ((Utah State Senate, Jen Plumb, n.d.)).
She often backs regulations that protect health and the environment, like overdose‑prevention and other public‑health bills, even when they add some extra steps for individuals ((Salt Lake Tribune, 2023)).
So if HB0018 (Public Land Access Amendments) mainly asks hunters and fishers to have licenses as a way to manage wildlife, fund conservation, and improve safety, it would be reasonable to predict she’d lean supportive, as long as fees and access rules aren’t unjust or discriminatory.
If the bill made it harder for low‑income or rural people to use public land—or criminalized them harshly—her record suggests she might push back or want changes, rather than just saying yes.

For your assignment, could you write a few sentences that *explain your reasoning* for what her stance is likely to be—using her background (doctor, public‑health focus, Democrat) and the goals of hunting/fishing licenses—then click *Continue with AI* to work on that explanation, OR go to Create Document to start or upload your draft?

what do u think is jen plumbs stance on bill HB0018, this is for the state of utah

Fri, 20 Feb 2026 13:38:02 -0500

Here’s what I can see so far:

HB0018 in the 2025 Utah session is titled “Petroleum Storage Tank Amendments” and deals with regulations and fees for petroleum storage tanks, not with health care, schools, or social issues ((BillTrack50, UT HB0018, 2025)).
Jen Plumb is a Democratic state senator and a physician known for sponsoring public‑health‑oriented bills (like substance use treatment in jails, fentanyl test strips, and human composting) and for advocacy on LGBTQ+ issues and transgender youth ((Utah News Dispatch, 2025); (Salt Lake Tribune, 2025)).
I couldn’t find a clear record that she is the sponsor of HB0018 or that she has spoken publicly for or against *this* specific bill; without an explicit vote or statement, I can’t honestly say her stance for sure.
Given her general record—pro‑regulation on health and environmental risks, and focused on data‑driven public safety—it would be reasonable to *guess* she’d look at HB0018 through a public‑health and environmental‑protection lens, but that’s an inference, not a documented stance.

If this is for a class project, do you want to use her *documented* positions (on things like overdose prevention or youth protection) to infer and explain what her stance on HB0018 is likely to be, instead of claiming you know it for sure—then click *Continue with AI* to think that through together, OR go to Create Document to start drafting your assignment or upload a source?

could make things more difficult

Wed, 18 Feb 2026 15:14:47 -0500

could make matters worse if federal employees are frustarted with state empoloyyes aruging over their jobs

Wed, 18 Feb 2026 15:14:37 -0500

more in-state control, hands on approach

Wed, 18 Feb 2026 15:14:05 -0500

would help regulate our parks better so our parks are cleaner

Wed, 18 Feb 2026 15:13:39 -0500

more control over what is happening by state officals who are conserned with our national parks

Wed, 18 Feb 2026 15:13:06 -0500

are state is in extreme drought

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:28:38 -0500

we had a very wet october but still are seeing the driest paterns of perciptiaiton to tdate

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:28:23 -0500

there will most likely be above average temperatures

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:27:38 -0500

there is a chance utah can benefit if the jet stream is in the right spot

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:27:18 -0500

mormons are less liekly to join a new religion after leaving their church

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:25:56 -0500

younger people are more likely to leave the church

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:25:35 -0500

mormons started having less children over the years

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:24:22 -0500

data is squewed because people are still considered in the church if there name is on their roll

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:24:09 -0500

utah population data rapidly declines

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:22:22 -0500

population decling

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:17:20 -0500