Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit?
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Resubmission
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit?
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
1)
As used in this section:
(a)
(i)
"Peer coach" means a trained student who volunteers to provide non-clinical,
peer-to-peer mental health support to another student.
(ii)
"Peer coach" does not mean a licensed mental health professional.
(b)
"Program" means the Peer-to-Peer Counseling Program created in Subsection
(2)
.
(c)
"Student" means an individual enrolled at an institution.
(2)
There is created the Peer-to-Peer Counseling Program to:
(a)
foster positive mental health among students on institution campuses;
(b)
provide a student with mental health support from trained peer coaches, including the
support listed in Subsection
(6)(a)
; and
(c)
provide wellness resources to manage personal, academic, and emotional challenges.
(3)
The board shall:
(a)
administer and oversee the program;
(b)
review and approve the training for a peer coach described in Subsection
(5)(a)
;
(c)
create standards for the program, regarding:
(i)
the program's outcomes and goals;
(ii)
identifying and referring a student in need of professional help to a licensed
mental health professional; and
(iii)
reporting requirements for a peer coach;
(d)
subject to legislative appropriations, distribute funds to each institution to support the
program at the institution; and
(e)
make rules in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative
Rulemaking Act, to implement the requirements of this section.
(4)
An institution that receives funds from the board described in Subsection
(3)(d)
shall:
(a)
establish and implement the program created in this section; or
(b)
use the funds to provide other mental health services to students on the institution's
campus.
(5)
An institution that elects to implement the program in accordance with Subsection
(4)(a)
shall:
(a)
create and provide training to a student that volunteers to become a peer coach; and
(b)
ensure that a student completes the training before providing support as a peer coach.
(6)
A peer coach:
(a)
may provide support to a student through:
(i)
coaching;
(ii)
mentoring;
(iii)
counseling;
(iv)
assisting with personal, academic, or emotional challenges;
(v)
accessing campus resources; and
(vi)
advising the student seek professional care when appropriate; and
(b)
may not:
(i)
diagnose a student; or
(ii)
provide clinical therapy to a student.
(7)
This section does not:
(a)
create a cause of action against a peer coach for an act or failure to act under this
section;
(b)
waive governmental immunity in accordance with Section
63G-7-201
;
(c)
create or expand liability for an institution; or
(d)
create an employment relationship between a peer coach and an institution.
Section 2.
FY 2027 Appropriations.
The following sums of money are appropriated for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2026, and ending June 30, 2027.
These are additions to amounts previously appropriated for
fiscal year 2027.
Subsection 2(a).
Operating and Capital Budgets
Under the terms and conditions of Title 63J, Chapter 1, Budgetary Procedures Act, the
Legislature appropriates the following sums of money from the funds or accounts indicated for
the use and support of the government of the state of Utah.
ITEM 1
Utah Board of Higher Education - Administration
From Income Tax Fund
(1,500,000)
Schedule of Programs:
Pass Through Funding
(1,500,000)
ITEM 2
Utah Board of Higher Education - Student Support
From Income Tax Fund
1,500,000
Schedule of Programs:
Peer-to-Peer Counseling
1,500,000
Section 3.
Effective Date.
This bill takes effect on
May 6, 2026
.
Dominika W(Feb 10 2026 11:01AM):
Possible Issues with this
more
While I mostly support this proposal, I think it has a few faults. I think the main one lies in a student trying to connect with a “peer coach”, and it not working out well due to the fact the student and the peer coach do not know each other well. When talking about mental health, there is a massive amount of trust being placed in the other person, and the fact that these peer coaches still are peers, can contribute to a possibly uncomfortable nature of communication. I also know that the peer coach would be trained how to handle certain situations where the things shared would be needed to get reported to people higher up. Obviously this is a good thing in terms of safety, but how can this program foster open communication while also ensuring that safety is prioritized? Overall I like the concept of more mental health access in university settings though.
I think providing students with the opportunity to have support in multiple different facets of university life, with all of its challenges is obviously beneficial. Where I think this specific proposal is a lot better than other proposed solutions is that it is done via peers. I think that this is a lot more accessible than having designated counseling or a more structured setup, which could possibly feel overwhelming to students who need help but are not confident to speak up and ask for it.
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
While I mostly support this proposal, I think it has a few faults. I think the main one lies in a student trying to connect with a “peer coach”, and it not working out well due to the fact the student and the peer coach do not know each other well. When talking about mental health, there is a massive amount of trust being placed in the other person, and the fact that these peer coaches still are peers, can contribute to a possibly uncomfortable nature of communication. I also know that the peer coach would be trained how to handle certain situations where the things shared would be needed to get reported to people higher up. Obviously this is a good thing in terms of safety, but how can this program foster open communication while also ensuring that safety is prioritized? Overall I like the concept of more mental health access in university settings though.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
I think providing students with the opportunity to have support in multiple different facets of university life, with all of its challenges is obviously beneficial. Where I think this specific proposal is a lot better than other proposed solutions is that it is done via peers. I think that this is a lot more accessible than having designated counseling or a more structured setup, which could possibly feel overwhelming to students who need help but are not confident to speak up and ask for it.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
General Document Comments 0