Debating Decorum: A Contrast in Political Manners and Misconduct

1 additions to document , most recent about 1 month ago

When	Why
Oct-31-24	After the Debates Music and Image

“You can tell Harris means well and is a great person overall. She wants to change America for her friends who have been wronged, hoping to help many others as well.” “Walz seems very serious about his work!! His talk is NOT cheap.” “Trump keeps interrupting Harris along with the moderators. He needs to wait his turn, which shows he's an unfit president.” “Vance kept talking while the moderators were trying to move on so they cut his mic. So unprofesh.” These are four comments I published regarding both the Democratic and Republican parties while watching an intriguing Presidential debate on September 10th and a Vice presidential debate on October 1st. There is a huge difference between the Democratic and Republican candidates. Harris and Walz are very respectful and great people outside of politics. However, the same cannot be said for Trump and Vance, these two candidates are disrespectful and just terrible people outside of their political jobs.

I’ve acknowledged Republican candidates constantly spew out absurd claims about “illegal aliens” that have recently come to America to live the American dream. I noticed Trump along with Vance were very guilty of this, so I asked AI, “What negative things have immigrants done?” AI responded, “Vance alleged that immigrants were responsible for an 81% increase in murders, but data from Springfield Police Division doesn’t support this claim. Murders have indeed increased, but not too extreme as Vance describes, and there’s no concrete evidence linking these crimes to immigrants.” You may be asking whether Tim Walz has said anything negative about immigrants. The answer is no. AI states, “Tim Walz has maintained a supportive stance towards immigrants throughout his political career. He has often highlighted positive contributions of immigrants to society and economy.”

Lastly, the most important thing when voting is to consider policies/plans. The democratic party, Kamala Harris, and Tim Walz are all about doing things for the greater good. They’re fighting for a New Way Forward that protects our fundamental freedom as American citizens, providing tax cuts for middle-class citizens, and striving for a stronger democracy. In other ways, it’s recognized Trump stated he had “concepts of a plan” during the presidential debate. However, after some inquiry with AI, I discovered that Trump’s and Vance’s plans are the complete opposite of the democratic party. They plan to take away abortion rights, give upper-class tax cuts, as well as impose tariffs on every import coming into U.S. territory.

To wrap up, I advise you to research these candidates but one choice is unquestionably wiser than the other.

DMU Timestamp: October 30, 2024 20:08

2 archived comments