Vertical farms synthesis essay
Vertical farming in a rather recent agricultural phenomenan. It offers farmers the ability to plant and produce crops without soil or sunlight. It increases the convenience of growing in unfavorable environments (Source B) and allows more access to fresh produce in previously inaccessible environments. But at what cost? Does this new farming method utilize more resources than it ought? Does it needlessly impact it’s environmental surroundings in a wasteful and negative way? Not without nuance, I argue that the environmental consequences of this technology are worth the benefitis for this rapidly evolving farming method.
According to Source B, vertical farming, for some crops, offers 10 to 20 tiemes the yield opposed to its traditional open-field counterpart. It has a more efficient production rate than traditional farming methods. Although, according to Source C, vertical farming’s initial investment per unit land is much higher than its open field counterpart, this financial risk offers a much higher reward and yield than conventional farming techniques, as also noted in Source C. Contrary to the opinion of Jonathan Foley from Source D, this financial investment is more meritable and rewarding due to its high output rate compared to traditional farming.
Financially, vertical farming is worth the effort. But what of the environmental repercussions? Vertical farming transforms environments for the benefit of the environment. Vertical farming utilizes abandoned warehouses and shipping containers and repurposes them. As in Source B, it elevates and transforms those environments to a higher purpose with more use and function. It also takes up nowhere near as much acreage as traditional farming- something we will need to be considerate of in the future.
According to source F, the amount of arable land that we need to produce for the growing population of the world (a predicted additional 2.7 Billion people) is not available. Therefore we need more environmentally and spacially sensitive alternatives to produce our food. Vertical farming is financially more rewarding with its high output and more environmentally rewarding with the less space it takes to produce.
on the uploaded document.
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
General Document Comments 0
Your text discusses the benefits and potential drawbacks of vertical farming. To enhance the clarity and flow of your writing, consider revising the following:
1. Sentence Structure: Incorporating a variety of sentence structures can make your writing more engaging. For example, in the sentence “Vertical farming transforms environments for the benefit of the environment,” you could add a subordinate clause to provide more detail or context. You might revise it to say, “By repurposing abandoned warehouses and shipping containers, vertical farming transforms environments for the benefit of the environment.”
2. Subordinate Clauses: Adding subordinate clauses can help to provide additional information or clarify relationships between ideas. In the sentence “According to Source B, vertical farming, for some crops, offers 10 to 20 times the yield opposed to its traditional open-field counterpart,” you could restructure it to include a subordinate clause, such as “According to Source B, vertical farming, which is used for some crops, offers 10 to 20 times the yield compared to its traditional open-field counterpart.”
3. Transition Words: Using transition words can improve the coherence of your text. For instance, in the sentence “But what of the environmental repercussions?” you could use a transition word like “However” or “Nevertheless” to connect this idea to the previous one more smoothly. This could be revised as “However, what are the environmental repercussions of vertical farming?”
As you continue to refine your writing, remember that incorporating subordinate clauses can add depth and complexity to your sentences. By varying your sentence structures and utilizing subordinate clauses effectively, you can enhance the overall quality of your writing.
I encourage you to edit lines, sentences, and paragraphs in your text. If you are the owner of the document, you can double-click on any sentence or paragraph, edit and update.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation
In your text, you have already used a concessive clause effectively. The sentence “Not without nuance, I argue that the environmental consequences of this technology are worth the benefits for this rapidly evolving farming method” presents a concession in your argument, acknowledging a counterpoint before asserting your perspective.
To further refine your concessive clauses, consider incorporating them in a structured manner to enhance the flow and coherence of your writing. For example, in the sentence “Although, according to Source C, vertical farming’s initial investment per unit land is much higher than its open-field counterpart, this financial risk offers a much higher reward and yield than conventional farming techniques,” you can refine the concessive clause to provide a clearer contrast. Restructuring it as “Although vertical farming’s initial investment per unit land is much higher than its open-field counterpart according to Source C, the financial risk offers a significantly higher reward and yield than conventional farming techniques” can make the concession more impactful.
By refining your concessive clauses with clear contrasts and transitions, you can strengthen the argumentative structure of your text. This will help to present a more nuanced and well-supported perspective on the benefits and drawbacks of vertical farming.
As you work on refining your concessive clauses, remember to maintain a balance between acknowledging opposing viewpoints and asserting your argument effectively. This will contribute to a more persuasive and coherent presentation of your ideas.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
New Conversation