AI and the Future of Education: Philosophical Questions about the Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom

Author: Dr. Md. Ekram Hossain*, Dr. Md. Ariful Islam

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803419S

Dr. Md. Ekram Hossain*, Dr. Md. Ariful Islam

Professor, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Rajshahi

*Corresponding Author

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803419S

Received: 07 November 2024; Accepted: 12 November 2024; Published: 17 December 2024

ABSTRACT

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational settings raises profound philosophical questions regarding the future of teaching and learning. AI technologies, such as adaptive learning platforms, automated grading systems and virtual tutors, are reshaping traditional educational practices. However, the role of AI in the classroom goes beyond technological convenience; it touches upon fundamental issues such as the nature of knowledge, the role of the teacher, and the human experience of learning. This article critically examines the philosophical implications of AI’s growing influence in education. By exploring concepts from epistemology, ethics, and the philosophy of education, we address key questions: How does AI alter the dynamics of the student-teacher relationship? Can AI effectively teach critical thinking, creativity, and ethical reasoning, or does it merely reinforce rote learning and standardized outcomes? What are the moral responsibilities of educators and developers in designing AI tools that shape educational experiences? Moreover, we consider the risks of over-reliance on AI, such as dehumanization in education, data privacy concerns, and the potential loss of intellectual autonomy. The article argues that while AI offers unprecedented opportunities to personalize education and expand access, it also demands careful reflection on its limits and ethical implications. Philosophical inquiry into the role of AI can help guide educators, policymakers, and technologists in making informed decisions that preserve the integrity of human-centered education. The balance between technological efficiency and fostering deep, critical learning must be struck with deliberate consideration of the broader philosophical landscape.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Philosophy of Education, Student-Teacher Relationship, Critical Thinking, Ethical Reasoning, Educational Technology, Intellectual Autonomy, AI Ethics

INTRODUCTION: AI AND THE FUTURE OF EDUCATION

The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education marks a profound shift in how learning is structured, delivered, and experienced. AI-driven technologies such as adaptive learning systems, automated grading platforms, virtual tutors, and educational chatbots promise to revolutionize traditional teaching methods by enhancing efficiency, personalizing learning, and expanding access to education. However, the rapid adoption of AI in classrooms worldwide raises critical philosophical questions about its long-term impact on the nature of education, the role of teachers, and the quality of student learning experiences. Philosophically, education is not merely the transmission of information; it involves fostering critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and creativity—skills that are deeply tied to human interaction and intellectual autonomy. Can AI, which is often designed to optimize performance and standardize outcomes, fulfill these broader educational goals? What are the implications of relying on algorithms to teach students to think critically, engage ethically, and create innovatively? Scholars such as Neil Selwyn, in his book Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (Selwyn, 2016, p. 142), argue that while technology can complement education, it must not supplant the human elements that make learning a transformative experience. AI, by its nature, prioritizes efficiency and data-driven learning, potentially neglecting the emotional, ethical, and social dimensions of education that are central to holistic development.

Furthermore, the student-teacher relationship—a cornerstone of traditional education—faces fundamental redefinition in AI-enhanced classrooms. Teachers are not merely dispensers of knowledge but serve as mentors, moral guides, and role models for students. With AI handling increasingly complex tasks like personalized learning pathways, educators may find their roles shifting toward that of facilitators or overseers of technological tools. This transformation raises a vital philosophical question: Can AI replicate the empathetic, intuitive, and context-sensitive guidance that human teachers provide, or will its introduction lead to the dehumanization of education? Scholars like Gert Biesta, in The Beautiful Risk of Education (Biesta, 2014, p. 28), emphasize that education involves unpredictability and the need for human presence, which AI may not be capable of addressing. These concerns also extend to ethical dimensions, particularly regarding the responsibility of educators, policymakers, and AI developers in shaping AI tools that prioritize equitable and just educational practices. There are growing concerns about algorithmic bias, data privacy, and the potential for AI to perpetuate inequalities by favoring certain demographics or learning styles over others. As education philosopher Sharon Todd notes in Learning from the Other (Todd, 2003, p. 53), ethical education involves encountering the other—recognizing and addressing the diverse needs of students in their individual contexts. AI, by automating decisions, risks overlooking the nuances that are crucial to fostering a genuinely inclusive and ethical learning environment.

In light of these philosophical concerns, this article seeks to explore the broader implications of AI’s role in the classroom. It will examine critical questions regarding the nature of knowledge in an AI-driven education, the redefinition of teacher-student relationships, the capacity of AI to nurture critical thinking and creativity, and the ethical responsibilities involved in implementing AI in education. Ultimately, this inquiry aims to offer a balanced perspective that acknowledges AI’s potential benefits while cautioning against its unchecked adoption, underscoring the importance of maintaining a human-centered approach to education.

LITERATURE REVIEW: AI AND THE FUTURE OF EDUCATION

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in educational environments has sparked substantial academic discourse, spanning diverse fields including educational technology, philosophy of education, ethics, and cognitive science. This section provides an overview of key literature that examines the philosophical and ethical implications of AI in education, highlighting the complex interactions between technology, pedagogy, and human experience.

1. Educational Technology and AI Integration

The literature on AI in education often begins by highlighting the transformative potential of AI-driven technologies. Researchers such as Luckin et al. (2016) have explored how AI can enhance personalized learning, adapt instructional content to student needs, and automate administrative tasks, such as grading and monitoring progress, allowing educators to focus more on individualized student support. In Enhancing Learning and Teaching with Technology (Luckin et al., 2016, p. 74), the authors argue that AI has the potential to democratize education by providing scalable, individualized learning experiences. However, critiques of this optimistic view are emerging. Neil Selwyn, in Is Technology Good for Education? (Selwyn, 2019, p. 89), presents a more cautious approach, highlighting that while AI can improve efficiency, it may not necessarily lead to better learning outcomes. Selwyn points out that there is a risk of AI reducing education to a purely transactional exchange, where data-driven decisions overshadow the nuanced, relational aspects of learning that are vital for holistic student development.

2. Philosophy of Education and AI

Philosophers of education have raised concerns about the deeper implications of AI on the educational process. Gert Biesta’s The Beautiful Risk of Education (2014, p. 35) introduces the idea that education involves an inherent unpredictability, which AI, with its algorithmic precision, may overlook. Biesta argues that education should foster not only knowledge acquisition but also the cultivation of critical thinking, creativity, and the capacity to engage with uncertainty. The use of AI, he suggests, risks creating an overly deterministic model of education, where learning outcomes are predefined by algorithms, limiting students’ opportunities for exploration and intellectual risk-taking. Furthermore, in What is Education For? (Standish, 2020, p. 112), Paul Standish questions the very nature of knowledge in an AI-driven educational landscape. He explores whether AI, which operates on pattern recognition and data processing, can genuinely teach students to understand complex ideas or merely enable them to recall information efficiently. Standish emphasizes that true education is about developing the ability to question, critique, and interpret knowledge, capabilities that AI may not be able to foster.

3. Ethics of AI in Education

The ethical implications of AI in education have also become a focal point in the literature. A primary concern is the potential for algorithmic bias. Noble’s Algorithms of Oppression (2018, p. 64) provides a critical examination of how AI systems, including those used in education, can reinforce existing social inequalities. Noble argues that AI is not neutral; rather, it reflects the biases of its creators and the datasets on which it is trained. In the context of education, this raises significant ethical questions about fairness, inclusivity, and the perpetuation of systemic discrimination. For example, AI systems might unintentionally disadvantage students from underrepresented groups by misinterpreting their behavior or learning needs based on biased data. Sharon Todd’s work, Learning from the Other (Todd, 2003, p. 57), also speaks to the ethical challenges posed by AI in the classroom. Todd emphasizes the importance of recognizing the diversity of learners and the ethical responsibility of educators to engage with students’ individual needs and backgrounds. She argues that AI systems, by automating interactions and decisions, may reduce the opportunities for teachers to form meaningful, empathetic relationships with students—relationships that are essential for addressing the moral and emotional dimensions of education.

4. AI and the Student-Teacher Relationship

One of the most frequently discussed topics in the literature is the impact of AI on the student-teacher relationship. Traditionally, teachers are seen not only as knowledge providers but also as mentors and role models who guide students in their intellectual, emotional, and moral development. The introduction of AI challenges this dynamic by shifting some of the teacher’s responsibilities to machines. In The Digital Divide in Education (Livingstone, 2012, p. 145), Sonia Livingstone examines how the student-teacher relationship is being transformed by digital technologies, including AI. She argues that while AI can support administrative tasks, its use in pedagogical roles risks undermining the emotional and interpersonal connections that are central to effective teaching. AI-driven systems, she notes, are primarily designed to deliver content and assess performance, but they lack the capacity for empathy, intuition, and moral guidance, which are critical components of the teaching profession.

Similarly, debates about the dehumanization of education are central to Jaron Lanier’s You Are Not a Gadget (Lanier, 2010, p. 184). Lanier critiques the rise of digital technologies, including AI, for their tendency to prioritize efficiency over human depth and complexity. He warns that AI’s algorithmic nature could lead to a mechanization of education, where the rich, unpredictable, and deeply personal aspects of learning are lost in favor of streamlined processes.

5. Opportunities and Challenges: Striking a Balance

While the philosophical and ethical critiques are significant, the literature also points to opportunities for AI to enhance education if used thoughtfully and responsibly. Luckin et al. (2016, p. 106) advocate for a balanced approach, where AI serves as a tool to complement, rather than replace, human teachers. They argue that AI can provide valuable insights through data analytics and personalized learning but caution against over-reliance on technology at the expense of human agency. Educational scholars such as John Dewey, although writing long before the advent of AI, have also contributed to this dialogue. In Democracy and Education (Dewey, 1916, p. 118), Dewey advocates for an education that fosters democratic participation and critical engagement, principles that can still guide the ethical integration of AI into modern classrooms.

AI and the Nature of Knowledge

The introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education raises profound philosophical questions about the nature of knowledge itself. Traditional education has long been centered on the transmission and construction of knowledge through human interaction, where teachers guide students not only in acquiring facts but also in understanding, interpreting, and critically engaging with information. With AI now assuming roles in knowledge delivery, grading, and even content creation, it is essential to explore whether AI is capable of contributing to these higher-order cognitive processes or if it merely perpetuates a superficial understanding of knowledge.

1. Knowledge as Information vs. Knowledge as Understanding

AI, by design, excels at processing and delivering vast amounts of information. It can analyze patterns, adapt content to individual learning needs, and provide instant feedback on student performance. However, as philosophers like Paul Standish note, there is a critical distinction between information and understanding. In What is Education For? (Standish, 2020, p. 78), Standish argues that true knowledge involves more than just recalling facts; it requires the ability to contextualize, interpret, and engage critically with information. AI, focused on efficiency and optimization, tends to prioritize the transmission of information over fostering deep, conceptual understanding. This raises concerns that students might become passive recipients of data rather than active participants in constructing meaningful knowledge.

Neil Selwyn, in Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (Selwyn, 2016, p. 137), expands on this critique, suggesting that AI’s approach to learning often emphasizes quantifiable outcomes, such as test scores or completion rates, at the expense of more intangible but crucial aspects of education, such as critical thinking and intellectual autonomy. Selwyn warns that when education is reduced to the transfer of information through AI-driven systems, students may lose opportunities for reflection, questioning, and engagement with complex ideas—processes that are essential for developing a deeper understanding of the world.

2. Epistemological Shifts: AI’s Impact on the Concept of Knowledge

Philosophically, AI’s role in education forces a reconsideration of epistemology—how we define and acquire knowledge. Traditionally, knowledge has been viewed as something constructed through human experience, dialogue, and interaction. John Dewey, in his seminal work Democracy and Education (Dewey, 1916, p. 67), posited that knowledge is not a static set of facts to be transmitted but a dynamic process that involves inquiry, experimentation, and personal engagement with the world. Dewey emphasized the importance of experiential learning, where students actively participate in their own education by exploring ideas, asking questions, and solving problems.

AI, by contrast, tends to operate on pre-programmed algorithms that provide information based on established patterns. While AI can simulate inquiry by guiding students through structured learning paths, it does not truly engage in the open-ended, exploratory processes that characterize human knowledge construction. As Gert Biesta points out in The Beautiful Risk of Education (Biesta, 2014, p. 49), education involves an element of risk—an unpredictability that AI, with its emphasis on control and optimization, cannot accommodate. The very nature of learning, according to Biesta, is to encounter the unexpected and to wrestle with ambiguity, processes that AI-driven systems are inherently ill-equipped to manage. This raises the philosophical question of whether AI can truly support the development of knowledge in its fullest sense or if it merely offers a more efficient means of information transfer.

3. The Role of AI in Teaching Critical Thinking and Epistemic Agency

Critical thinking is often highlighted as one of the most important skills that education should foster, yet it is also one of the most difficult to mechanize. Scholars like Tim Gorichanaz, in Understanding Self as a Process (Gorichanaz, 2021, p. 163), argue that critical thinking requires not just the application of logic but also the ability to reflect on one’s own cognitive processes, challenge assumptions, and engage with multiple perspectives. While AI can present students with logical problems and guide them through step-by-step solutions, it lacks the ability to encourage the kind of reflective, self-aware thinking that characterizes true epistemic agency—the capacity to make independent judgments and contribute to the creation of knowledge.

This issue ties into broader philosophical debates about the nature of intelligence itself. In Super intelligence (Bostrom, 2014, p. 205), Nick Bostrom discusses how AI systems, despite their impressive computational abilities, differ fundamentally from human intelligence in their lack of consciousness, creativity, and moral reasoning. Bostrom’s argument highlights the limitations of AI in supporting the kind of critical, creative, and ethical engagement that true education requires. While AI can assist in learning procedural knowledge or improving efficiency, it is unlikely to replicate the nuanced, deliberative processes that characterize human learning.

4. Concerns about Over-Standardization and the Loss of Intellectual Autonomy

Another significant concern in the literature is that AI’s reliance on algorithms and data-driven learning may contribute to over-standardization in education, undermining students’ intellectual autonomy. As Jaron Lanier argues in You Are Not a Gadget (Lanier, 2010, p. 211), the more we rely on AI to manage and structure learning, the more we risk turning education into a mechanistic process where students are guided toward predetermined outcomes, rather than being encouraged to think independently. This has profound implications for how knowledge is defined and valued in educational contexts. If AI prioritizes efficiency, predictability, and measurable outcomes, it may devalue the messiness, creativity, and unpredictability that are intrinsic to genuine intellectual exploration.

Neil Selwyn echoes these concerns in Should Robots Replace Teachers? (Selwyn, 2019, p. 99), noting that AI-driven educational systems often prioritize certain forms of knowledge—typically those that are easily quantifiable—while marginalizing others. Subjects that involve critical thinking, creative problem-solving, and ethical deliberation may be deprioritized in favor of more formulaic learning objectives that AI can easily manage. This over-reliance on algorithmically-driven knowledge could result in a narrowing of educational experiences, where students are encouraged to conform to set patterns of thinking rather than developing their intellectual independence.

AI’s Role in Teacher-Student Relationships

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education raises crucial questions about its impact on the teacher-student relationship, a cornerstone of traditional learning environments. Teachers have historically served not only as instructors but also as mentors, role models, and facilitators of intellectual, emotional, and moral growth. The advent of AI challenges this dynamic by shifting some of the teacher’s responsibilities to machines, potentially redefining the relationship between teachers and students. AI can enhance educational experiences by taking over administrative tasks, personalizing learning, and providing data-driven insights into student progress. This allows teachers to focus more on fostering creativity, critical thinking, and emotional support. However, this shift also raises concerns. Sonia Livingstone, in The Digital Divide in Education, points out that while AI can support the practical aspects of teaching, it cannot replicate the empathetic and intuitive dimensions of the teacher-student connection. These qualities—empathy, moral guidance, and the ability to respond to unique student needs—are fundamental to effective teaching and cannot be programmed into AI systems.

Moreover, as Jaron Lanier highlights in You Are Not a Gadget, there is a risk that over-reliance on AI may lead to a mechanization of education. The rich and unpredictable human elements of the learning process could be sidelined in favor of efficiency and standardization, potentially diminishing the interpersonal bonds that foster trust, inspiration, and mutual respect between teachers and students. On the other hand, AI offers opportunities to support inclusivity and accessibility. For instance, AI-driven tools can assist students with disabilities or provide tailored interventions for those struggling academically. Teachers can use these tools to better understand student needs and adapt their teaching methods accordingly. However, the success of such integrations depends on the teacher’s active role in interpreting AI-generated insights and ensuring that technology complements, rather than replaces, their responsibilities. Ultimately, AI’s role in teacher-student relationships must be carefully balanced. While AI can be a valuable assistant in delivering content and managing learning environments, the human aspects of teaching—empathy, intuition, and moral guidance—remain irreplaceable. The future of education lies in using AI to augment these human qualities, ensuring that the teacher-student relationship continues to be a central and enriching element of the learning experience.

Human Experience in AI-Driven Classrooms

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into classrooms is reshaping the human experience of learning, prompting critical philosophical questions about what it means to teach and learn in an increasingly technological environment. Education, at its core, has always been a deeply human endeavor, involving not just the transfer of knowledge but the cultivation of critical thinking, moral insight, and emotional connections. AI’s role in this transformation brings both opportunities and significant challenges.

1. Personalization and the Risk of Isolation

One of AI’s most celebrated contributions to education is its ability to personalize learning. Adaptive platforms can tailor content to individual student needs, pace, and preferences, fostering an inclusive environment where learners of diverse abilities can thrive. However, this individualized approach may inadvertently erode the shared learning experiences that create a sense of community in the classroom. Philosophers like John Dewey emphasize the importance of collaborative inquiry and democratic participation in education, principles that risk being overshadowed by AI’s focus on individual metrics.

2. The Loss of Emotional Connection

Teaching is not merely the delivery of information; it is also about building relationships and providing emotional support. Human teachers possess empathy, intuition, and the ability to inspire and mentor students in ways that AI systems cannot replicate. While AI can simulate aspects of interpersonal interaction through chatbots or virtual tutors, these interactions lack the depth and authenticity of human relationships, which are essential for motivating students and addressing their emotional and psychological needs.

3. Intellectual Autonomy and Critical Reflection

AI excels in delivering information and facilitating procedural learning, but it struggles with fostering intellectual autonomy and critical reflection. Education should encourage students to question assumptions, engage with ambiguity, and develop their unique perspectives. As Gert Biesta points out in The Beautiful Risk of Education, learning involves encountering the unexpected and grappling with uncertainty—experiences that AI, with its algorithmic precision and predictability, cannot effectively provide.

4. Ethical Considerations and Human Agency

AI’s increasing role in classrooms raises ethical concerns about surveillance, data privacy, and the potential for bias in algorithmic decision-making. These issues highlight the importance of preserving human agency in educational settings. Teachers play a crucial role in mediating the ethical implications of technology use, ensuring that students develop a critical understanding of AI’s benefits and limitations.

5. Balancing AI and Human-Centered Education

To maintain the richness of the human experience in AI-driven classrooms, it is crucial to strike a balance. AI should be seen as a tool that enhances, rather than replaces, the roles of teachers and the communal aspects of learning. Policymakers, educators, and technologists must work collaboratively to design AI systems that align with human values, prioritizing empathy, creativity, and moral insight alongside efficiency and scalability.

CONCLUSION

The philosophical literature surrounding AI in education reveals deep concerns about how AI may alter the nature of knowledge, learning, and critical thinking in the classroom. While AI has the potential to enhance the efficiency of knowledge transmission and provide personalized learning experiences, its limitations in fostering deep understanding, critical engagement, and intellectual autonomy are significant. Philosophers like Dewey, Biesta, and Standish remind us that education is more than just information transfer; it is a process of inquiry, reflection, and meaning-making that requires active human participation. As AI continues to shape the future of education, it is essential to remain mindful of these philosophical dimensions, ensuring that the pursuit of technological innovation does not undermine the fundamental goals of education.

The role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education extends far beyond mere technological convenience; it touches upon fundamental issues such as the nature of knowledge, the teacher-student relationship, and the human experience of learning. While AI offers unparalleled opportunities to enhance learning efficiency and personalize education, it also raises significant concerns about its limitations in fostering deep understanding, critical thinking, and ethical reflection. This research article suggests that while AI can accelerate learning outcomes, its focus on efficiency and data-driven approaches risks undermining the transformative essence of education. Philosophical inquiry provides a vital lens to address these challenges, guiding policymakers and educators toward ethical and balanced integration of AI in education systems. Thus, it is imperative to strike a balance between the technological efficiency of AI and the fostering of deep, critical learning. Education should not only aim to transmit information but also nurture intellectual curiosity, creativity, and moral insight. By preserving the human-centered nature of education, stakeholders can ensure that AI serves as a tool to complement and not replace the profound dimensions of learning.

REFERENCES

1. Biesta, G. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

Paragraph 59 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 59, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 59, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 59, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
2. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Paragraph 60 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 60, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 60, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 60, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
3. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.

Paragraph 61 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 61, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 61, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 61, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
4. Gorichanaz, T. (2021). Understanding self as a process: An exploration of personal information in context. London: Emerald Publishing.

Paragraph 62 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 62, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 62, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 62, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
5. Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget: A manifesto. New York: Vintage Books.

Paragraph 63 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 63, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 63, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 63, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
6. Livingstone, S. (2012). The digital divide in education. London: Routledge.

Paragraph 64 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 64, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 64, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 64, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
7. Luckin, R., et al. (2016). Enhancing learning and teaching with technology: What the research says. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.

Paragraph 65 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 65, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 65, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 65, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 65, Sentence 4 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
8. Noble, S. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.

Paragraph 66 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 66, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 66, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 66, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
9. Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

Paragraph 67 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 67, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 67, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 67, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
10. Standish, P. (2020). What is education for?. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Paragraph 68 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 68, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 68, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 68, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.
11. Todd, S. (2003). Learning from the other: Levinas, psychoanalysis, and ethical possibilities in education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Paragraph 69 0
No paragraph-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 69, Sentence 1 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 69, Sentence 2 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

Paragraph 69, Sentence 3 0
No sentence-level conversations. Start one.

DMU Timestamp: February 26, 2025 22:37

General Document Comments 0