Copy and paste everything you’ve written for your Problem-Solutions synthesis Essay
The “Why I’m interested in my topic” section of the project Google Doc
“Where’s my thinking” update on Writing Partners (Feb. 19)
Summaries of my sources from my project Google Doc or from Writing Partners
(see step 1 of the Week 2 assignment)
I'm interested in this as political polarization is something that has grown a lot over the last decade. Politics interests me, as well as the law, and currently, we see political polarization everywhere. It has divided America and has set the basis for just hate. You look at people who think differently and they are completely wrong because they don't agree with you. There are a lot of parts to politics, and polarization and how they come together.
Throughout my research, reading, and annotations so far, I have learned a lot. The first article I found mostly talked about how traditional media platforms have shifted to "opinions about the news" rather than the news itself, as it draws in viewers, and ratings go up. This means more money for the people behind the scenes. I also learned a lot about social media and the ways that it contributed to political polarization. Social media allows anyone to post anything, so the spread of misinformation is easier. People get stuck in echo chamber, which is where they hear only opinions that are similar to their own. I think that my inquiry will continue to focus on how political polarization and social media, but start to tie in traditional media more as well. Political polarization could be one of the biggest issues in America politically, and it has only skyrocketed over the last decade. It has divided the US, and if you don't agree with a sid,e then you are just incorrect in the views of those people. Overall, there is a lot to still learn, and things that we can do about political polarization, but if we want anything to change, then it will take everyone.
X argues that
Flavia Roscini argues that social media and traditional news outlets like Fox News and MSNBC increase political polarization by focusing on opinion-based content, which drives ratings but spreads misinformation and deepens division.
Roscini, Flavia. “How the American Media Landscape is Polarizing the Country.” Pardee Atlas, Boston University, 8 Sept. 2023, https://sites.bu.edu/pardeeatlas/advancing-human-progress-initiative/back2school/how-the-american-media-landscape-is-polarizing-the-country/#_ftn44.
Many people assume that
Many people assume that social media is just a neutral platform where users freely express their opinions. However, recent studies show that algorithms shape what we see and can actually push users toward more extreme views.
Howard, Philip N. “Is Social Media Fuelling Political Polarisation?” The Conversation, 11 Apr. 2024, https://theconversation.com/is-social-media-fuelling-political-polarisation-232749.
When it comes to the topic of social media and political polarization, most of us will readily agree that platforms like Facebook, and twitter have changed how we get our information. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether these platforms help or harm democracy. While some are convinced that social media simply reflects already existing divisions, others believe that it is actively worsening polarization through echo chambers and misinformation.
“How Did Political Polarization Begin, and Where Does It End?” Duke University – Impact, https://impact.duke.edu/story/how-did-political-polarization-begin-and-where-does-it-end.
The article "How The American Media Landscape is Polarizing the Country" by Flavia Roscini goes through how social media and traditional news channels have increased political polarization in the United States. The author highlights that networks such as Fox News and MSNBC have started to focus more on “opinions of news” rather than the actual news itself. This attracts larger audiences, and ratings go up which means more money. The article also goes through the role of social media and how it facilitates misinformation. Traditional news channels are one way whereas in social media anyone can post anything making it 2 way.
The article “How Social Media Platforms Can Reduce Polarization” takes a different perspective on how we can solve our political polarization issue within the United States. It goes into why polarization is happening in the first place and different ways that we can combat it. It talks about how we are less polarized than we think but social media amplifies and makes it worse. The article then dives into different ways that we can combat this, such as by fostering more “positive interparty contact.” We can collaborate with researchers, design better user interfaces, and correct misconceptions are all ways the article says that we can combat political polarization within the United States. They made an interesting point about the EU Digital Servies Act which makes platforms accept responsibility for the content on their platform, how it impacts society, etc.
The article “Is social media fuelling political polarisation?” examines different studies and roles that social media has played in increasing political divisions. It talks about how platforms create “echo chambers” which is basically when you get stuck in hearing your own opinions. This reinforces people's existing beliefs. Another study also showed that being exposed to opinions from the otherside did not help polarization but actually made it worse. These platforms allow for the spread of misinformation by not really regulating what goes on. Research has found that algorithms prompt more inflammatory content which makes political polarisation worse in the end.
The article “How did Political Polarization Begin, and Where Does it End?” highlights the origins and the current challenges of political polarization. It goes into social media specifically and how that has increased division within the United States. It cites events like the Captial Riot in 2021 and it goes into how political opposiotion has evolved over the last little bit. A lot of people see that when Donald Trump came into the political world it became polarized but this article disagrees stating that we were polarized long before him and will be polarized long after him. The article mainly goes into different theories of polarization, and how in a free market, where anyone can say what they want, misinformation, and lies come with it.
The article “The Role of (social) Media in Political Polarization: A Systematic Review” goes into the rise of political polarization because of traditional news media as well as the spread of misinformation through social media. The article examined 94 articles or 121 studies that assessed the role of social media in affecting political polarization. They found that pro-attitudinal media makes political polarization worse. They also found that ideological and affective polarization is not measured or consistent. They suggest that more research is needed on this issue.
2025 Jack F : News channels are reporting less on news and more on "opinions" to garner people's attention, improve ratings, etc. Its all about rating and money
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI View in Context
Mar 7
2025 Jack F : Interesting point made that listening to contrary opinions actually polarizes more
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI View in Context
Mar 7
2025 Jack F : An interesting point of people's social identities has become more aligned with their political identities.
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI View in Context
Mar 7
2025 Jack F : The goal of the media is to outrage and spark fear as that's what draws attention. If you turn on the news, and everything is going great, no one is going to watch. Ratings will go down, and that means less money.
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI View in Context
Mar 7
2025 Jack F : Echo chambers are spaces that reinforce our opinions and "tell us how we are right"
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI View in Context
Mar 7
2025 Jack F : Social media allows people to create news unlike cable news which creates misinformation
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI View in Context
Mar 7
2025 Jack F : Social Media creates "filter bubbles" where you are more likely to see posts of your friends then other people
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI View in Context
Mar 11
2025 Jack F : Social Media = 2 way Cable news = 1 way
2025 Jack F : What would have happened if it weren't so polarized?
Your Thoughts View in Context
Mar 12
2025 Jack F : Affective polarization is how those people with those who disagree (politically)
Your Thoughts View in Context
Mar 12
2025 Jack F : Interesting point made that polarization is likely to rise when they encounter content with partisan cues
Your Thoughts View in Context
Mar 12
2025 Jack F : Interesting..
Your Thoughts View in Context
Mar 12
2025 Jack F : The goal is to press "emotional buttons" so then you get more of an engagement
Your Thoughts View in Context
Mar 12
2025 Jack F : Most Americans think we are more divided than we actually are. Why?
Your Thoughts View in Context
Mar 12
2025 Jack F : More interaction = like more
Your Thoughts View in Context
Mar 12
2025 Jack F : Is this realistic though?
Your Thoughts View in Context
Mar 12
2025 Jack F : How do you show we arent as polarized as we thought?
Your Thoughts View in Context
Mar 12
2025 Jack F : Way that Europe combats polarization
Your Thoughts View in Context
2025 Jack F : Interesting
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 7 1
Paragraph 7, Sentence 3 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Why is this?
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 11 2
Paragraph 11, Sentence 1 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Why is this personality trait correlated with it
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 11, Sentence 4 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Dominance is key element in all of this
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 14 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Those who are hostile ar emore likly to be aggressive in person discussions
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 15 1
Paragraph 15, Sentence 1 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Personalities as well as social contexts play a roll in political hostility
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 18 1
Paragraph 18, Sentence 3 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Some people purposely outrage to generate clicks, etc
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 21 1
Paragraph 21, Sentence 1 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Point
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 26 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Get isolaed into echo chambers where you only hear your own opinions
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 28 1
Paragraph 28, Sentence 1 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Thats what you think would happen
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 29 1
Paragraph 29, Sentence 2 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Interesting point in how claims produced by the other side reinforce partisans from each side. Makes you more seperated
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 31 1
Paragraph 31, Sentence 3 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Strengethens what is already there
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
2025 Jack F : How social media has been used in other ways politically
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 5 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Polarized long before Trump but maybe we didn't know it? Will be polarized long after
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 9 1
Paragraph 9, Sentence 2 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Skeptical about truths ability to surface by itself?
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 11 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Social Media is a massive open marketplace for ideas which makes it hard to control/regulate
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 15 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Legitimate opposition is when political opponents allow each other to peacefully be challenged
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 16 1
Paragraph 16, Sentence 2 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Lies and misinformation are just something that come along with a free marketplace where ideas are exchanged
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Paragraph 18 1
Paragraph 18, Sentence 1 1
Mar 13
2025 Jack F : Separate the difference between the two
Edit Your Thoughts Continue with AI
Logging in, please wait...
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
General Document Comments 0
Questions for Exploration
Up next: A Writer’s Think-Aloud will walk you through what it looks like to start developing ideas around one of these questions, showing you how a writer thinks on paper and raises new questions. This can help you understand your own thinking process as you write! Want to see the next section?
Try it yourself! These examples are just models—your own ideas and voice matter most. Choose a topic and begin your own exploration. We can’t wait to see what you have to say about your chosen topic. Start your composition right over there on the left side. Add to
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
A Writer’s Think-Aloud
So, a writer’s brain is full of questions, connections, and possibilities as they start. This helps the writing stay focused and deep, not just a list of facts.
Up next: MAPS—Mode, Media, Audience, Purpose, Situation. This section will help you consider what kind of writing you’re making, who it’s for, and how best to get your message across. It’s like a roadmap for making your writing effective and targeted! Want to see the next section?
Try it yourself! These examples are just models—your own questions and voice will shape your writing in unique ways. Pick a question from your list, start your own think-aloud, and see where your ideas lead. We can’t wait to see your work grow. Start your composition right over there on the left side. Add to Document, come up with a working title, and let it fly!
Would you like to see how MAPS could help shape your project?
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment