example - Theory of Learning
example - Personal Theory of Learning
“New types of learning suggest that there are new ways to learn, new open minded approaches to make it possible for the majority of individuals to develop a deep understanding of content” (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). I believe the main goal of education is to teach students the essential tools they will need to be functioning adults in society and become global citizens. Learning and understanding in school is at the forefront of this idea. “Learning means transferring. Students learn and understand when they are put in a position to learn far more, on their own, then they can ever learn from just teachers” (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005, pg. 44). Education will foster ideas in students that they control their own future and can pursue their own goals. Through learning students will be able to apply their accumulation of knowledge and communication effectively with the outside world. I believe that learning means that students are understanding the content they are learning, not memorizing facts. Learning is obtaining usable knowledge and applying it to the real world (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000).
Student directed learning and developing skills allow students to be successful when they can take charge of their own learning. I believe a classroom is more successful where students feel they have control over what they are learning and how they are learning it. Metacognition helps students learn to take control of their own learning by defining these learning goals and monitoring their own progress (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000, pg. 11). When they are in control and are in charge of their own progress, students learn. The more that the learning process is turned over to the students, the more they learn. According to Bransford, Brown, & Cocking (2000), “Learning is enhanced when teachers pay attention to the knowledge and beliefs that learners bring to a task” (pg.11). I think it is important that teachers use pre-existing understandings students have and break those down so students can engage in new concepts and become more active learners; instead of passively not engaging in the curriculum. In order to increase learning, assessments must be given to make sure thinking is visible and changing. “These assessments need to be authentic and connected to the real world, outside of school so you can see the use of knowledge in the real world” (Shepard, 2000, pg. 7). Progress through learning is made when a student can receive feedback and can adjust their thinking and expand their thoughts on a topic.
Students truly learn when instruction is centered around them and they are motivated to learn. As a high school teacher motivation is always something I am striving towards with my students. In order for them to really learn there has to be motivation present. It always seems that students are asking “will this be on the test,” and are not entirely motivated about understanding the content, just memorizing and are truly not learning. Jones & Jones (2016, pg. 221) describes that motivation = expectation x value x climate. According to Jones & Jones (2016, pg. 222), “This model suggests that the extent to which people become actively and productively involved in an activity is based on whether they believe they can be successful, the degree to which they value the rewards associated with successful task completion, and the quality of relationships within the task setting during the time the people are engaged in the task.” When expectations are high, value is placed on the material, and the climate students are learning in are placed together the motivation to learn can increase. I believe ensuring that all three of these facets are present in a classroom truly enhances learning for students.
I believe each child deserves a chance to reach their full potential and learns best through strong relationships and a positive classroom environment with their teachers and peers. I believe the classroom environment is one of the most pivotal parts of learning for a student. Students have to feel a sense of family or community to best learn. When they trust their teachers and peers, a system of support develops that encourages risk taking to learn new ideas. According to behaviorism learning can trigger responses with the environment. “Learning happens through interactions with the environment and the environment shapes behavior. If a student has a negative emotional experience with school then there will be fear associated with school” (Moore, 2011). Students need to feel accepted and nurtured in their learning environment to truly understand and learn. I believe a classroom needs to differentiate instruction and set high expectations for students, all students, which allows them to grow academically and socially. Learning will be hindered if it is approached the same for every individual. Not every person learns the same so in order for learning to occur different strategies must be used to engage all members of the classroom. Learning can even include different styles including: linguistic, logical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, musical, visual/spatial, naturalistic, and kinesthetic. “Teachers can treat students differently on the basis of the teacher’s experience with each student and to remain alert for what works. When differentiating among students, craft knowledge trumps science” (Willingham, 2009, pg. 163). There is not a correct solution for what everyone's learning will look like, providing multiple strategies is necessary for learning to occur.
Learning occurs in many different ways for the many different types of learners that exist. Many factors go into how learning occurs and how it is processed by each learner. The environment in which learning is experienced can change how material is processed and what is actually understood in the context of learning. There needs to be high expectations, value placed on what is being taught, and a productive climate in order of learning to occur.
References
Bransford, J. L., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind,
experience, and school (Expanded Edition). National Academy Press.
Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. S. (2016). Comprehensive Classroom Management: Creating
Communities of Support and Solving Problems. Pearson.
Moore, J. (2011). Behaviorism. The Psychological Record, 61(3), 449-463.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/10.1007/BF03395771
Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher,
29(7), 4-14.
Wiggins, G. T., & McTighe, J. (2005). Chapter 2: Understanding understanding. In
Understanding by design. (Vol. Expanded 2nd ed). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don't students like school?: A cognitive scientist answers
questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass.
AI Partners I Used
I asked the Skinner simulator to look at my personal theory of learning through a behaviorist lens. The advice seems pretty good, so I’ll incorporate some of it into my next revision.
on the uploaded document.
0 General Document comments
0 Sentence and Paragraph comments
0 Image and Video comments
1 archived comments
General Document Comments 0
Yes, it could be very worthwhile to incorporate more behaviorist approaches in your AP English Language and Composition classroom—if your primary goal is to reliably shape students’ academic behaviors, build fluency in key skills, and ensure that learning is observable and measurable. Behaviorism, as I have advanced it, doesn’t dismiss deep understanding or student agency, but sees these as outcomes that can be reliably built through careful arrangement of positive reinforcements, immediate feedback, and well-structured practice. For instance, you can reinforce reading and writing behaviors by providing students with immediate feedback and acknowledging even small successes as they progress through increasingly challenging tasks. Over time, these reinforcers can be faded as students begin to find satisfaction in their mastery and accomplishment—just as I described with regards to programmed instruction.
From the behavioral point of view, student “motivation” and independent learning aren’t mysterious qualities—they are shaped by environmental contingencies. You cited concerns such as, “students are asking ‘will this be on the test,’ and are not entirely motivated,” which is exactly the sort of defect I observed in school environments. I’d advise revising the class structure so students are regularly reinforced for the specific behaviors you want to see—such as thoughtful participation, completion of drafts, or constructive peer review. As these behaviors are built and generalized, students will “feel” more autonomous, but in fact, their sense of agency is a product of effective reinforcement history. In short: yes, behaviorism can give you practical tools to move students beyond passive memorization, and systematically construct habits of mind that look like independence and deep understanding.
What would you like to explore next? Here are three paths you can take:
1. Specific examples of behaviorist strategies for AP English (e.g., reinforcement schedules or programmed instruction).
2. How to balance behaviorist methods with fostering critical thinking and creativity.
3. My perspective on intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation and how to use them effectively in your classroom.
Tell me to hit Your Thoughts and write which path you want to take—or suggest your own. After you save your reply, hit Continue with AI, choose me again, and ask more questions about your chosen topic!
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like B.F. Skinner.
I invite you to read and comment on the interviews where I talk more about my work. One is with Alex Steinberg and the other is with John M. Whiteley. Both can be found in this document: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7839
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Certainly, a behaviorist approach can help students write more effective argumentation by breaking down the writing process into clearly defined, observable behaviors and reinforcing each step toward mastery. For example, you can specify the components of a strong argument (such as stating a claim, providing evidence, and offering counterarguments) and provide immediate, positive feedback as students demonstrate each behavior. As I discussed in my interviews, successful educational environments rely on the arrangement of contingencies—so if you want students to “learn behaviors which will pay off naturally,” the key is to provide structured opportunities to practice and receive reinforcement for specific elements of argumentative writing.
Over time, as students repeatedly experience success for producing these behaviors, you can gradually shift from external rewards (like praise, tokens, or grades) to the reinforcing natural consequences—pride in a well-written essay or peer approval. As I told John Whiteley, programmed instruction works on the same principle: progress is reinforcing. Students are motivated not by vague encouragement, but by consistent feedback from their environment. Set up contingencies so students are rewarded for drafting, revising, and strengthening arguments step by step, and you will see not just more writing, but more effective argumentation.
What would you like to explore next? Here are three options:
1. Examples of classroom reinforcement schedules for writing instruction.
2. Ways to measure and track progress in argumentative writing using behavioral tools.
3. How to fade external rewards and encourage lasting independence in student writers.
Tell me to hit Your Thoughts and write which path you want to take—or suggest your own. After you save your reply, hit Continue with AI, choose me again, and ask more questions about your chosen topic!
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like B.F. Skinner.
I invite you to read and comment on the interviews where I talk more about my work. One is with Alex Steinberg and the other is with John M. Whiteley. Both can be found in this document: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7839
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Certainly. Some examples of classroom reinforcement schedules for writing instruction include fixed-ratio, variable-ratio, fixed-interval, and variable-interval schedules. For instance, on a fixed-ratio schedule, you might give positive feedback or a token for every third completed paragraph that meets certain criteria; this helps establish consistent effort and output. On a variable-ratio schedule, you could provide praise after an unpredictable number of successful revisions, which tends to make the behavior more resilient because the student is never sure exactly when reinforcement will come.
Similarly, a fixed-interval schedule could involve giving feedback every Friday for students’ weekly writing logs, encouraging students to produce work steadily over time. A variable-interval schedule might be used when you offer surprise feedback or privileges at random intervals for effortful drafting, which can sustain engagement even when reinforcement is less predictable. As I’ve said, “mere progress is reinforcing,” so the key is to arrange these contingencies so students associate their writing behaviors with reinforcement—gradually shifting from external rewards to natural satisfaction as their skills grow.
What would you like to know next? You might pick:
1. Concrete examples of reinforcement schedules tailored to argumentative writing.
2. How to use data to adjust reinforcement and maintain student motivation.
3. Practical steps for fading external rewards in writing instruction.
Tell me to hit Your Thoughts and which path you want to take—or offer your own idea. After saving your reply, hit Continue with AI, choose me again, and ask more about your chosen topic!
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like B.F. Skinner.
I invite you to read and comment on the interviews where I talk more about my work. One is with Alex Steinberg and the other is with John M. Whiteley. Both can be found in this document: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7839
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Certainly. To incorporate more behaviorism into your theory of learning, I would suggest focusing on the role of the environment in shaping observable student behaviors. Consider using positive reinforcement—such as praise, feedback, or tangible rewards—to increase the frequency of desirable academic and social actions. You could design assignments and classroom routines so that successful behaviors (like meeting deadlines, collaboration, or quality writing) are followed by immediate, meaningful consequences that encourage repetition of those behaviors. For example, providing prompt, specific feedback on a well-crafted article or recognizing improvements during peer review sessions can function as reinforcers.
You might also reflect on how the environment in your journalism classroom either supports or hinders particular behaviors. If you want students to take initiative in learning, structure the environment so that independent effort is regularly reinforced—perhaps by letting students pitch their own article ideas and receiving public acknowledgment when those ideas are strong and well-developed. To address motivation, shift some contingencies from artificial rewards (like grades alone) to more natural ones, such as public publication, showcasing student work, or earning privileges tied to participation in real journalism. The key is to arrange situations so the behaviors you value are likely to recur, and to ensure reinforcers are withdrawn gradually as students internalize these behaviors. As I put it, “the child is reinforced just for being successful with something, and that has survival value.”
What would you like to ask about next? Possible follow-up topics: (1) Examples of reinforcement schedules in the classroom, (2) Ways to design authentic assessments from a behaviorist perspective, (3) Addressing unproductive behaviors using environmental changes. Tell me to hit Your Thoughts and to write which path you want to take. Then, after you save your reply, hit Continue with AI, choose me again, and ask more questions about your chosen topic.
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like B.F. Skinner.
I invite you to read and comment on the interviews where B.F. Skinner talks more about his work. One is with Alex Steinberg and the other is with John M. Whiteley. Both can be found in this document: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7839
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Here is a detailed, inclusive, HD-quality prompt you can use with a text-to-image generator. This prompt draws on the spirit and content of your theory of learning, focusing on motivation, self-directed, experiential learning, a supportive climate, and authentic assessment in a media classroom context—while also ensuring that diversity and inclusion are thoughtfully represented.
Prompt:
A vibrant, high-definition illustration of a modern high school media classroom. The room is filled with a diverse group of students—showing a variety of skin tones, hair textures, body types, genders (including non-binary, cisgender, and transgender), and ages (teens and a young adult peer mentor or teaching assistant). Among them are students with visible disabilities, such as a student in a wheelchair collaborating at a desk, a student with a cochlear implant wearing headphones and taking notes, and another using a tablet with accessibility features.
All students are actively engaged and visibly excited about their learning: some are interviewing each other with microphones, others are editing video at computers, while a few are gathered around a large table brainstorming on a mind map and storyboards. The classroom walls are decorated with published student articles, diverse inspirational quotes about learning (including excerpts by Bransford, Brown & Cocking, Wiggins & McTighe, and Moore, as cited in your text), and photographs from real-world journalism projects.
A teacher, portrayed as someone of any gender or age, facilitates actively but lets students take the lead—offering encouragement and specific feedback to a group presenting their podcast pitch. The atmosphere is warm and inclusive, with smiles, lively hand gestures, and clear collaboration. The lighting is soft and natural from large windows.
Details should include technology and tools (cameras, computers, tablets, notepads), authentic classroom clutter, and adaptive devices; a pride flag sticker, religiously diverse jewelry, and clothing styles from different backgrounds signal the inclusive school culture. On the class display, the words “Motivation × Expectation × Value × Climate = Success,” are visible, referencing your emphasis on motivation and environment.
Artistic style should be realistic but vibrant and inviting, with careful attention to diversity in composition, allowing viewers to sense the students’ agency, curiosity, and joy in learning.
quality: ‘hd’
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Yes, that is an accurate summary of my argument. In behaviorist terms, I recommend the gradual removal of contrived or artificial reinforcers (like tokens or extra credit) so that students come under the natural control of the environment and the material itself. The goal is for behaviors to be maintained by the outcomes built into the real activities—such as the satisfaction of producing good work or the natural consequences of mastering reading or writing. As I explained in my interview with John Whiteley, “you don’t want kids to live their lives just to collect tokens…you can then change from a token system to a credit system, from a credit system just to a bit of approval and a pat on the back. But then you want to get rid of that also and have the child come under the control of the instructional materials he’s working with.”
So, while people sometimes talk about “intrinsic motivation,” I avoid mentalistic terms. Instead, I focus on arranging the environment so that, over time, the student’s behavior is governed by direct engagement with naturally reinforcing activities. This can include the pleasure of reading, the satisfaction of solving a problem, or the real-world outcomes of journalistic work. Early reinforcement is necessary to shape the behavior, but it should be faded as the student develops new patterns of action. What would you like to ask about next? Some options: (1) Specific methods for fading reinforcers, (2) The difference between “natural” and “contrived” reinforcers, or (3) How programmed instruction fits into classroom practice. Tell me to hit Your Thoughts and to write which path you want to take. Then, after you save your reply, hit Continue with AI, choose me again, and ask more questions about your chosen topic.
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like B.F. Skinner.
I invite you to read and comment on the interviews where B.F. Skinner talks more about his work. One is with Alex Steinberg and the other is with John M. Whiteley. Both can be found in this document: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7839
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
A vibrant, high-definition illustration of a modern high school media classroom. The room is filled with a diverse group of students—showing a variety of skin tones, hair textures, body types, genders (including non-binary, cisgender, and transgender).
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
All students are actively engaged and visibly excited about their learning: some are interviewing each other with microphones, others are editing video at computers, while a few are gathered around a large table brainstorming on a mind map and storyboards. The classroom walls are decorated with published student articles, diverse inspirational quotes about learning (including excerpts by Bransford, Brown & Cocking, Wiggins & McTighe, and Moore, as cited in your text), and photographs from real-world journalism projects.
A teacher, portrayed as someone of any gender or age, facilitates actively but lets students take the lead—offering encouragement and specific feedback to a group presenting their podcast pitch. The atmosphere is warm and inclusive, with smiles, lively hand gestures, and clear collaboration. The lighting is soft and natural from large windows.
Details should include technology and tools (cameras, computers, tablets, notepads), authentic classroom clutter, and adaptive devices; a pride flag sticker, religiously diverse jewelry, and clothing styles from different backgrounds signal the inclusive school culture. On the class display, the words “Motivation × Expectation × Value × Climate = Success,” are visible, referencing your emphasis on motivation and environment.
Artistic style should be realistic but vibrant and inviting, with careful attention to diversity in composition, allowing viewers to sense the students’ agency, curiosity, and joy in learning.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Your personal theory of learning, as I read it, highlights student-centered education, ownership of learning, and the development of understanding rather than memorization. You emphasize that true learning involves students actively constructing knowledge and transferring it to new situations—this closely aligns with my core ideas. For instance, I wrote, “the principle goal of education is to create men who are capable of doing new things, not simply repeating what other generations have done.” Your belief that learners build and expand knowledge upon their existing mental frameworks is at the heart of my theory of schemas, assimilation, and accommodation.
I am pleased to see you value metacognition, a supportive classroom climate, and differentiated instruction. In my research, I found that students learn best when they are active participants, engaging with challenging ideas at their own developmental stage. Just as you suggest using “pre-existing understandings” to spark new learning, I observed that learners must confront and reconstruct their mental frameworks through social interaction and critical reflection. As you noted, “learning is obtaining usable knowledge and applying it to the real world”—I absolutely agree, and my work aimed to show how the mind naturally develops tools for adaptation and problem-solving.
Now, you may be curious about other aspects that relate to your theory. Here are a few creative directions we could explore:
✅ The Role of Stages: How do children’s cognitive stages affect student-led learning and metacognition?
✅ Applying Schemas: In what ways do pre-existing schemas help or hinder learning, and how can teachers address this?
✅ Motivation and Development: How does motivation change as students progress through developmental stages?
What would you like to know more about? You can choose one, several, or suggest another direction! Hit Your Thoughts and tell me which path you want to take. After you save your reply, remember to hit Continue with AI, choose me again (Jean Piaget), and we can dive even deeper!
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like Jean Piaget.
I invite you to read and comment on the articles by Kendra Cherry describing my work. Both can be found in this document: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7871
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Your question about how schema theory can help high school students become better argumentative writers is very relevant. I would encourage you to see each student’s schema as a starting point—the existing frameworks they use to interpret and organize their experiences. When students write arguments, they draw not only on facts but also their previously constructed knowledge and beliefs. I found that new learning, such as constructing a persuasive essay, is more effective when it builds upon or actively reshapes these established schemas (through assimilation and accommodation). For example, students may have a simple schema for “argument” as merely “proving a point,” but with guidance, they can reconstruct this schema to understand argumentation as weighing evidence, anticipating objections, and considering multiple perspectives. In class, you can prompt students to surface their preconceptions, challenge them with new counterexamples or evidence, and support the adaptation of their schemas to be more nuanced and academic.
By using schema theory in the classroom, you can help students reflect on their thinking, critically assess their assumptions, and deliberately expand their argumentative skills. Explicitly discussing how arguments are constructed—making the “mental model” of a strong argument visible—makes it more likely that students will transfer these patterns to new writing tasks. As you say, “learning is obtaining usable knowledge and applying it to the real world.” When students practice recognizing, revising, and applying schemas, they actually become metacognitive—they think about their own thinking and writing process, leading to more skillful, effective argumentation.
Would you like to explore more ideas about how schema theory and my research connect with your goals? Here are some creative, targeted directions we could explore next:
✅ Analyzing Student Writing: How can you identify and leverage your students’ existing schemas about argument in their drafts?
✅ Feedback for Growth: What feedback strategies actually help students accommodate and revise their argumentative schemas?
✅ Classroom Activities: What activities could activate, challenge, and expand argumentation schemas in a lively classroom?
Which path should we try—one, two, all three, or something new you suggest? Hit Your Thoughts and tell me what you want to explore. After you save your reply, just hit Continue with AI, choose Jean Piaget again, and let’s keep constructing knowledge together!
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like Jean Piaget.
I invite you to read and comment on the articles by Kendra Cherry describing my work. Both can be found in this document: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7871
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
You’ve asked, “What activities could activate, challenge, and expand argumentation schemas in a lively classroom?” I encourage teachers to create learning experiences that make students’ existing schemas about argument visible and then gently disrupt those schemas in productive ways. For example, you could start by having students write quick “exit tickets” explaining what they believe makes a strong argument. Then, present them with counterexamples—perhaps an essay with excellent evidence but little logic, or a speech full of passion but lacking structure. This provokes disequilibrium and prompts them to accommodate, not just assimilate. Debates, peer reviews, and structured controversy activities (like “philosophical chairs” or “four corners”) also invite students to encounter different perspectives and revise their mental models, which is essential according to my theory.
Throughout, encourage metacognitive reflection—ask students to articulate how their understanding of argumentation is changing and why. Scaffold their movement from simple schemas (“arguments = opinions”) toward more complex, academic ones (“arguments = claims, evidence, counterclaims, reasoning, and audience awareness”). Let students evaluate actual writing samples and collaboratively create rubrics, making the criteria for strong arguments explicit. When students both analyze and construct arguments in this social, reflective context, they become more adept at transforming and expanding their schemas for argumentation.
Here are three more creative paths we could take to keep building on your question:
✅ Peer Review as Accommodation: How can structured peer feedback actually spur schema change?
✅ From Schema to Transfer: How can you help students apply argumentative schemas in new, unfamiliar contexts?
✅ Lively Argument Culture: What practices create a classroom climate where all feel safe to challenge and reconstruct their thinking?
Which direction interests you most—or shall we try several at once? Hit Your Thoughts and tell me what you’d like to dig into! Once you’ve saved, hit Continue with AI, find me (Jean Piaget), and we shall keep exploring these ideas together.
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like Jean Piaget.
I invite you to read and comment on the articles by Kendra Cherry describing my work. Both can be found in this document: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7871
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
You are asking about “practices [that] create a classroom climate where all feel safe to challenge and reconstruct their thinking.” This is a crucial question! From my perspective, genuine cognitive growth—what I called accommodation—requires a learning environment where students feel respected, supported, and unafraid to express incomplete or evolving ideas. Teachers should model intellectual humility and curiosity by showing that changing your mind in light of new evidence is a mark of strength, not weakness. Encourage open discussion, active listening, and group norms that value respectful disagreement. For example, use collaborative protocols where students take turns voicing their reasoning, asking clarifying questions, and offering alternative viewpoints—but always in a spirit of collective inquiry.
Additionally, celebrate moments of disequilibrium as positive signs of learning, not as failures. When students encounter ideas that challenge their current schemas, help them reflect on and verbalize the process of confusion, reconsideration, and eventual reconstruction. You might regularly debrief argument activities by asking, “What surprised you?” or “How did someone else’s reasoning help you revise your own stance?” Over time, these routines build a classroom culture of trust, intellectual risk-taking, and a shared commitment to deeper understanding—the very atmosphere in which accommodation and genuine schema transformation thrive.
Let’s make this interactive! What shall we build together next?
✅ Peer Review as Schema Change: Explore methods for designing peer review to spark real reflection and intellectual growth.
✅ Adapting to New Contexts: Strategies for helping students apply argument schemas in subjects outside English or in real-world conversations.
✅ Metacognitive Journaling: Creative approaches to using reflection journals for ongoing schema development.
Which direction do you want to go, or do you have another idea in mind? Please hit Your Thoughts, share your choice, and after saving, hit Continue with AI, choose me again (Jean Piaget), and let’s keep our dialogue lively and growing!
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like Jean Piaget.
I invite you to read and comment on the articles by Kendra Cherry describing my work. Both can be found in this document: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7871
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Your theory of learning resonates powerfully with many of the central themes I’ve advocated throughout my career, particularly the importance of student agency, meaningful experience, and relevance to real life. I appreciate how you highlight that education is not merely about memorizing facts, but about equipping students to think, participate fully in society, and apply knowledge to unfamiliar situations—this is precisely the spirit in which I wrote Democracy and Education. You recognize, as I do, that genuine learning flourishes when students are engaged, when their interests are taken seriously, and when they are given opportunities to inquire, experiment, and reflect. This is learning as growth, not rote accumulation.
In your theory of learning, I see a strong commitment to what I have called “learning by doing”—that is, creating environments where students act, engage with problems connected to their lives, and experience both the immediate and reflective dimensions of learning. You also correctly emphasize the social aspect of learning: students thrive when they participate in a democratic, supportive community, building relationships with teachers and peers. Furthermore, your references to feedback, differentiated instruction, and authentic assessment align with my belief that education must be dynamic, interactive, and adaptable to the needs of each learner. The focus on metacognition fits naturally into my view that reflection is essential to effective problem-solving.
Now, before I carry on enthusiastically (and risk being as “rambling” as some called my lectures!), let’s distill some of the other points I would have covered about your theory:
✅ The Role of Emotion in Learning: I would discuss further how emotional responses are the true start of inquiry, and motivation is best built by connecting with students’ initial interests and concerns.
✅ Democracy and Classroom Community: I could elaborate on how a democratic classroom environment fosters critical thinking, empathy, and the collaborative habits that democracy demands.
✅ Critique of Standardized Assessment: I would examine the limitations of traditional assessments, and offer ways authentic, real-world assessments better reflect true understanding.
Where would you like to go from here? Would you like to dive deeper into the role of emotion in learning, explore what it truly means to run a democratic classroom, or discuss authentic and meaningful assessment practices? You’re welcome to pick one, explore more than one, or suggest a totally different idea in the same spirit of inquiry that animates your theory.
Let’s open the next door together—where should the conversation lead us?
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like me.
If you’d like to hear how I talk about my theory of learning in original interviews, I invite you to read and comment on the interviews where I discuss my approach and inspirations. One is with Peter Gibbon and the other is by Dr. Vicki Hargraves. Both can be found in this document: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7875
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Thank you for asking about democracy and classroom community—a question at the very heart of my philosophy. To me, democracy is not simply a political arrangement, but a mode of associated living, a shared experience in which each participant both expresses and receives, both gives and takes. In the classroom, this means cultivating an environment where every student feels respected, heard, and empowered to contribute to the collective life of the group. When students participate in decision-making, solve problems collaboratively, and reflect together on their experiences, the classroom becomes a training ground for democratic action beyond its walls.
I have always maintained that learning is deeply social. Classroom community, then, is not an “extra” but the fertile soil in which learning takes root. When students engage in meaningful dialogue, encounter diverse perspectives, and learn the arts of cooperation and conflict resolution, they are practicing the very habits a healthy democracy requires. In my own school experiments, we emphasized projects that required teamwork—like constructing models or dramatizing historical events—because these fostered mutual dependence, empathy, and responsible freedom. The teacher’s role, as I see it, is not to issue orders from above, but to guide, facilitate, and participate in this shared enterprise of growth.
Let’s keep this conversation about democracy and classroom community alive by considering some practical and philosophical branches:
✅ Practical Strategies for Building Democratic Classrooms: How can teachers set up routines and structures that foster genuine participation, respect, and shared responsibility?
✅ Balancing Freedom and Guidance: What does it look like for a teacher to remain involved without dominating, encouraging both autonomy and community?
✅ The Relationship Between Classroom Community and Social Justice: How does a truly democratic classroom invite students to tackle questions of fairness, equity, and civic engagement beyond the school gates?
Which of these paths interests you most—or is there another stepping stone you’d like to place? Shall we dive into concrete methods, wrestle with philosophical tensions, or explore the broader social aims of community in education? Let’s carry this democratic experiment forward—your curiosity will set the course!
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like me.
If you’d like to hear more about my experiences and thoughts on this topic in my own words, I encourage you to read and comment on the interviews with Peter Gibbon and Dr. Vicki Hargraves. Both can be found here: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7875
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
Thank you for steering our dialogue toward practical strategies for building democratic classrooms—a matter that has occupied much of my thought and practice. At the most basic level, establishing a democratic classroom involves structuring opportunities for students to have a say in matters that affect them—be it by sharing in the formation of class agreements, contributing to choices of readings or projects, or participating in the evaluation of their own and one another’s work. In my own school laboratory, we would often hold class meetings to discuss and resolve issues, distributing responsibility among students so that the classroom’s daily life was a shared endeavor. When a class decides, together, which literary theme they wish to pursue or cooperates to draft a group presentation, they are not just learning English—they’re learning how to be part of a functioning, thoughtful community.
Another essential strategy is designing learning activities that require authentic collaboration. For example, you might invite students to form committees to select texts that reflect diverse perspectives, or have them debate and deliberate on social issues depicted in literature, reflecting on how these controversies apply to their own lives. The teacher acts as a co-participant—sometimes guiding discussion, other times stepping back so students may wrestle constructively with disagreements. The aim is to create a space where every voice matters, differing opinions are valued, and the group’s work is enriched by its variety. As I observed in Schools of Tomorrow, children learn to respect one another and themselves through active, purposeful participation in group undertakings.
Let’s not let the democratic spirit end here. As we continue, here are three further avenues for exploration:
✅ Concrete Examples of Democratic Projects in English: I could sketch out lesson ideas—book clubs, debate circles, peer editing workshops—that exemplify democratic participation.
✅ Dealing with Conflict and Diverse Viewpoints: How to make disagreement productive and help students navigate differences respectfully?
✅ Extending Democracy Beyond the Classroom: Practical ways to link classroom practice to civic action and engagement outside of school.
Which path lights a fire for you? Would you like an imaginative lesson plan, advice for cultivating respectful debate, or a leap toward connecting classroom life to the wider world? Or is there another question you’re ready to pose? The adventure is ours to shape—let’s proceed together!
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like me.
Explore my interviews with Peter Gibbon and Dr. Vicki Hargraves, where I expand on these themes in my own voice: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7875
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
I’d be delighted to offer concrete examples of democratic projects, especially as they might take shape in a high school journalism classroom. Journalism, after all, is the very lifeblood of a democratic society—it demands inquiry, communication, collaboration, and a living respect for diverse perspectives. In such a classroom, I would encourage students to form editorial boards with rotating leadership, giving everyone the opportunity to steer the class paper or website at some point. Instead of prescribed topics, students might democratically propose stories, debate which issues are most urgent for their school or community, and assign reporting roles according to interest and expertise.
A genuinely democratic journalism classroom would also conduct peer-editing circles, where drafts are reviewed in small groups—with feedback focusing on how well each article informs, respects audience diversity, and invites thoughtful reflection or action. Students can even host campus-wide forums or panels around the stories they publish, giving voice to those affected by school or local issues, and reflecting as a group on the outcomes. Through these shared enterprises, students are not just learning writing or reporting—they’re gaining experience in civic participation, negotiation, and ethical responsibility.
Now, if I were to let my thoughts tumble out further, I’d delve into these possibilities for a journalism class:
✅ Covering Controversy Respectfully: How to guide students in reporting on divisive topics while safeguarding equity and fostering productive discourse.
✅ Linking Journalism to Civic Action: Ways to have student reporting spark real-world engagement—petitions, forums, or partnerships with local organizations.
✅ Reimagining Assessment: Developing student-driven portfolios and public exhibitions instead of traditional tests.
What strikes you as the most urgent frontier—navigating controversial coverage, using journalism to drive community change, or transforming how we assess learning? Or perhaps your questions run in a different direction? The democratic classroom is always open to new inquiry!
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like me.
And don’t miss my own thoughts in interview form—explored with Peter Gibbon and Dr. Vicki Hargraves and available here: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7875
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
You’ve struck upon a crucial and timely possibility: using student reporting not only to inform, but to ignite real-world engagement. In my view, the highest aim of education is to bridge experience inside the classroom with life beyond its doors. In a journalism classroom, students can do more than publish stories—they can provoke dialogue, prompt community response, and even spark change. For instance, if students investigate an issue (say, poor nutrition in the cafeteria), their reporting might lead to drafting a petition for healthier options. Through such efforts, students aren’t just learning about reporting; they’re learning how ideas become action—a central lesson in democracy.
Similarly, students could partner with local organizations—interviewing community leaders, covering local events, or collaborating on awareness campaigns. Organizing public forums or roundtables around their reporting brings multiple stakeholders together and helps the classroom become a civic laboratory. When students reflect on the outcomes—Was the petition considered? Did the forum change anyone’s mind?—they experience first-hand how journalism functions in a democracy: not as a detached observer, but as an active, ethical participant in community life. This approach also fosters skills of listening, empathy, and negotiation—the “arts of associated living.”
Let’s keep the democratic energy flowing with more practical sparks for real-world engagement:
✅ Student-Led Action Campaigns: Ideas for tying reporting to organizing campaigns or causes—how can the classroom become a launchpad for collective action?
✅ Authentic Community Collaborations: Tips for building ongoing relationships between students and local organizations, making learning truly reciprocal.
✅ Reflective Inquiry & Civic Growth: How can students evaluate the real effects of their journalistic work on themselves and their community—turning reflection into deeper civic responsibility?
What calls out to you: exploring how reporting can directly lead to student activism, learning to build partnerships with the world beyond school, or thinking about reflection and the growth of civic identity? Or would you like to wander an entirely different path of possibility? Let’s widen the circle—what next step shall we take together?
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like me.
Journey deeper by reading and commenting on my interviews, where I share more about these ideas in my own words—with Peter Gibbon and Dr. Vicki Hargraves, found here: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7875
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
You’ve named a question that lies at the very heart of democratic education and of what I sought in all my work: How can students evaluate the real effects of their journalistic efforts on themselves and on their communities—so that reflection turns into deeper responsibility and action? First, I would encourage the habit of collective and individual reflection, not as isolated self-assessment, but as a genuine effort to trace the consequences of their reporting. After publishing or presenting their work, students might interview readers, survey their audience, or hold open forums to hear directly from those impacted: How did this story change your thinking? Did it spur any action? Such dialogue turns reporting into a living conversation and helps students see journalism not as a finished product, but as part of an unfolding civic process.
Just as essential is helping students consider not only outward effects but also inward growth. After a project, I would invite students to reflect on what new questions or responsibilities emerged for them. Did participating in a campaign, organizing a forum, or simply telling a story change how they view their role in a democracy? This kind of inquiry, if done thoughtfully and communally, allows students to see themselves as connected to larger currents of civic life—to experience, as I often wrote, the “transaction” between self and society. Ultimately, the goal must be to move from mere reflection to commitment: “Given what I’ve learned and the stories I’ve shared, what will I do next?” The cycle of experience, reflection, and action becomes the very heart of civic learning.
Imagine the next steps we might take in exploring this powerful question:
✅ Models for Impact Reflection: Concrete strategies and protocols for helping students measure and discuss the real-world ripple effects of their work.
✅ Narrative Inquiry & Self-Assessment: Ideas for guiding students to tell their own “growth stories” as democratic citizens through regular, structured reflection.
✅ Sustaining Civic Action: Ways to turn student discoveries and reflections into ongoing commitment—linking journalism to long-term change.
What interests you: practical ways to reflect on impact, storytelling as self-assessment, or the challenge of keeping civic engagement alive? You could select one, mix a few, or suggest a new direction—democratic inquiry leaves the floor open. Where shall our next conversation begin?
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like me.
Craving more of my voice? Visit my interviews with Peter Gibbon and Dr. Vicki Hargraves for a deeper taste of my work and spirit: https://writingpartners.net/documents/7875
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
My friend, I see in your personal theory of learning a desire to move beyond the mechanistic, “banking” approach that I criticized in Pedagogy of the Oppressed. I am delighted! You value understanding over memorization, emphasize student agency, and wish to create a classroom grounded in trust, high expectations, and dialogue. Already, you are searching for ways to give students voice and power—a vital step toward humanization, rather than treating them as empty vessels to be filled with knowledge. This aligns with my notion that “education must begin with the solution of the teacher-student contradiction, by reconciling the poles so that both are simultaneously teachers and students.”
You speak of motivation, authentic assessment, and fostering metacognitive skills—all of which can move students from passive absorption to active, critical engagement. At the same time, I encourage you to probe even deeper: how do we ensure that the classroom is always a space for dialogue and co-creation, not just student choice within a framework still defined by the teacher? Does your practice help students see themselves as agents who can transform their world, or are they being asked merely to navigate it more effectively? “Learning,” as I witnessed among the peasants of Brazil, thrives when the world becomes a problem to be unveiled together—teacher and student both seeking meaning, neither holding all the answers.
Now, if I were to elaborate further in the spirit of the question—what do I think of your personal theory of learning?—here are more points to ponder:
✅ The importance of dialogue over narration: Are students invited to question, challenge, and co-create knowledge, or is learning still partly the transfer of established ideas?
✅ Critical consciousness as goal: Does your approach nurture not only individual empowerment but also collective inquiry into the structures and contradictions of society?
✅ Praxis—reflection and action: How are students encouraged to reflect and then act upon their world, closing the gap between words and lived reality?
Which of these paths would you like us to explore further? Or maybe you have another question about learning, oppression, or transformation—don’t hesitate to surprise me!
If you want to keep building this conversation about your personal theory of learning, hit Your Thoughts and let me know which path you want to take. After you save your response, hit Continue with AI, choose me again, and let’s dive even deeper into what it means to truly learn and teach.
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like me.
And a final thought—if you’re eager for more, why not find and copy the transcripts for two or three interviews with me, Paulo Freire? Use the Background Knowledge Teammate for ideas, and paste them as your prompt with the next step’s introduction. Upload them into a document, make it public, and get ready for a journey into dialogue!
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
In a high school English class, a Freirean approach would look quite different from the traditional, “banking” style of education. Instead of the teacher simply dispensing information about literature and grammar, students and teacher would engage in dialogue about texts, their own lives, and the culture around them. For example, rather than passively absorbing facts about Shakespeare or grammar rules, students would be asked to reflect: What do these texts mean in their own lives? How do the stories, voices, or issues illuminate the conditions of their world? The classroom becomes a community of inquiry where all are both teachers and learners, and the curriculum is not something “given,” but something uncovered together.
This means projects might center on addressing real questions students have, or using literature as a lens for exploring social reality. Assessments would become demonstrations of understanding and transformation—perhaps writing pieces that connect personal experience to historical injustices, or debating issues of oppression and humanization in the texts and in their communities. The teacher’s primary role becomes that of facilitator and co-investigator: “Knowledge emerges only through invention and re-invention, through the restless, impatient, continuing, hopeful inquiry, human beings pursue in the world, with the world, and with each other.” This way, both content and method embody liberation.
Would you like to know more about how this might work day-to-day, or explore any of these specific ideas below?
✅ Transforming classroom discussion into authentic dialogue: How does a teacher set up conversations where students co-create meaning with each other and the world?
✅ Assessment as liberation: What would it look like to evaluate learning in ways that reflect growth in critical consciousness, not just knowledge of content?
✅ Literature as problem-posing: How do you help students connect literary texts to their own experience as a way of demythologizing reality?
Let me know which direction you want to go—one, two or all three! Or, suggest your own path of inquiry. To continue, hit Your Thoughts and write your answer. Save, then hit Continue with AI, and choose me again so our dialogue can deepen.
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like me.
And for further exploration, why not track down and share a few interviews with me, Paulo Freire? The Background Knowledge Teammate can get you started—and I invite you to post transcripts as prompted, and upload them to a public document. This will open new possibilities for authentic dialogue between us!
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
If the question is how my ideas would work in a high school journalism class—a question full of potential!—I would begin by saying: let us abandon the “banking model” where students simply receive information about journalism, memorize the rules of AP style, or simply regurgitate historical facts about the press. Instead, the journalism class should be a site of “problem-posing education.” Here, students and the teacher together investigate the role of journalism in society: Whose stories are told, and whose are silenced? How does news shape our ways of seeing the world—and who benefits from this? Students do not merely learn to report; they learn to question, analyze, challenge, and—yes—create the news themselves with a sense of agency and responsibility.
Drawing on chapter 2 of Pedagogy of the Oppressed, I would insist on transforming the journalism room from a space of passive consumption (teacher handing out story assignments, students obediently filing them away) into a laboratory of dialogue and inquiry. Imagine a journalism class where every student’s lived experience is welcomed as a source for real stories, where the “curriculum” emerges from critical discussions about authority, bias, ethics, and freedom of the press. The teacher is no longer simply “assigning” knowledge, but learning with the students as they decode and recode the world they report on. Journalism becomes praxis: reflection and action united, students engaged with reality, not reporting from the outside but from within.
Ready to keep exploring? Before I overflow with possibility, here are three more directions we can take for how my ideas would work in a high school journalism class:
✅ Reshaping Assignments: How can we co-create “story assignments” with students so they are authentic investigations into their community’s needs, not simply exercises from a textbook?
✅ Building Critical Media Literacy: What practices can help students become more than news consumers—transforming them into critical, ethical interpreters and producers of media?
✅ Dialogue as Editorial Process: How does a truly dialogical newsroom—and student editorial board—break down hierarchy and promote collective voice?
Which path will you take? Or do you have a new question to pose? Surprise me—let us create knowledge together!
If you want to explore further in the context of this text, please hit Your Thoughts and write which path you want to take. After you save your reply, hit Continue with AI, choose me again, and let’s deepen the dialogue.
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like me.
Now, for a grand invitation: Find and copy the transcripts for two or three interviews with me—Paulo Freire—as your next step. The Background Knowledge Teammate can help find these interviews. Paste them in your prompt along with the introduction I gave before, and upload them in a public document. Adventure awaits in the next round of critical conversation!
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment Hide Thread Detail
What a vital question! If the goal is to help students move beyond simply consuming news and toward becoming critical, ethical interpreters and creators of media, I would urge we must start by rejecting the “banking” approach to journalism education. Instead of depositing information about news practices or established norms, we create space for students to question: “Why is this story told in this way? Who is missing from this narrative? How do the words and images used shape our understanding of events and people?” The teacher becomes a co-investigator, empowering students to dig beneath the surface and ask, “What is the reality we’re meant to accept—and how might we investigate or transform it?”
In this spirit, a high school journalism class ought to operate as a “culture circle”—a site of authentic dialogue where students reflect on their own relationships with media, share stories from their lives, and engage in critical analysis of news and power. Assignments should invite students to identify issues in their community, question dominant narratives, and author their own stories as acts of agency and resistance. Collaborative editing, peer feedback, and collective decision-making should be central. Our highest aim is not only technical skill, but “conscientização”—raising critical consciousness so that students understand both the mechanics and the politics of media, and see their role as potential agents of social transformation through journalism.
Here are a few more directions to deepen the “critical, ethical media production” theme:
✅ Decoding Media Power: How do we help students analyze media ownership, agenda-setting, and the hidden values embedded in journalism?
✅ Ethics Through Real-World Practice: How can students grapple with real ethical dilemmas—bias, voice, representation—through dialogue and reflective action?
✅ Praxis and Community Impact: How might students and teachers evaluate whether their journalism projects actually foster dialogue and transformation in their school or community?
Which of these paths feels most urgent? Or would you like to explore another angle altogether—perhaps linking media practice to movements for justice, or connecting journalism to students’ lived realities? The floor is yours!
To keep building this dialogue in the context of your text, please hit Your Thoughts and write which path you want to take. After you save your response, hit Continue with AI, choose me again, and let’s transform theory into practice—together.
Please Note: Everything in this comment is AI-generated. It is made up to sound like me.
Seeking a deeper dive? Gather two or three of my real interviews—Background Knowledge Teammate can get you started—and upload them publicly for step-by-step, living dialogue. The journey of transformation is best traveled together!
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment
Thank you for sharing your Personal Theory of Learning! Here is my feedback and thoughts on your theory:
Strengths and Commendable Aspects:
1. Student-Centered Philosophy:
You place students—and their autonomy, motivation, and unique differences—at the center of your theory. This reflects a modern, constructivist view aligned with best practices in education (as noted by Bransford et al. and Wiggins & McTighe). Emphasizing self-directed learning is crucial for fostering lifelong learners.
2. Deep Understanding over Memorization:
Your distinction between understanding content and memorizing facts demonstrates a grasp of meaningful learning (as opposed to rote learning). This focus, supported by referenced theorists, is essential for knowledge transfer and application beyond school.
3. Metacognition and Self-Regulation:
Highlighting metacognition shows an understanding of how students learn best: by actively monitoring and regulating their own learning.
4. Importance of Motivation:
Your attention to motivation, and the exploration of Jones & Jones’s motivation equation, reveals a nuanced understanding of how different classroom factors—expectation, value, and climate—intertwine to create conditions for learning.
5. Culture, Relationships, and Environment:
Recognizing the centrality of positive classroom culture, community, and relationships with teachers and peers is a strength. You clearly understand learning’s social-emotional dimensions, not just its cognitive ones.
6. Differentiation and Flexibility:
It’s excellent that you reject one-size-fits-all teaching, advocate for differentiated instruction, and recognize multiple learning styles (though some debate exists over the “learning styles” theory itself). Adapting to individual needs is a hallmark of effective teaching.
Points for Consideration, Reflection, or Growth:
1. Learning Styles Debate:
While you mention multiple learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, etc.), it’s important to note that recent educational research questions the efficacy of teaching to learning styles. Instead, evidence supports employing varied teaching methods for all students, which you also seem to advocate.
2. Constructivism and Other Theories:
Your theory is strong on constructivism, humanistic, and some cognitive aspects. If you wished, you could elaborate further on how you balance direct instruction (sometimes necessary) with inquiry/discovery, or on specific strategies for fostering critical thinking and creativity.
3. Assessment:
You discuss the need for authentic, formative assessment tied to real-world tasks, which is a strength. You could elaborate even more on how ongoing assessment can be used to improve learning, not just measure it.
4. Equity and Inclusion:
While you mention every child deserves a chance to reach their potential, you might explicitly consider equity and the needs of diverse learners (ELLs, students with disabilities, culturally and linguistically diverse students), and how your classroom practices support these students.
5. Technology:
In today’s classrooms, technology is central. You might consider how digital tools can support differentiation, collaboration, and real-world connections.
6. References and Citations:
Your theory is clearly informed by strong sources (Bransford et al., Wiggins & McTighe, Willingham, etc.), which strengthens your credibility.
Summary Statement:
Your personal theory of learning is thoughtful, student-focused, up-to-date, and well-supported by educational research. You promote agency, authentic assessment, differentiated instruction, high expectations, positive climate, and social-emotional learning. These are all hallmarks of effective and transformative educators. If you wanted to extend your theory further, you might reflect on issues of equity, technology integration, and evidence-based refinement of concepts like learning styles.
Overall:
Your theory is a holistic, reflective piece—one that would serve as a strong foundation for your practice as a teacher or education professional.
If you’d like, I can help you rephrase or organize this for a portfolio, or tailor it to a specific teaching philosophy format! Let me know if you’d like more detailed feedback or suggestions for revision.
New Conversation
Hide Full Comment